Search the Issue Highlights:  

Search Tips

Issue Index About SPR Subscriptions The Author  
 

 

 
     

February 2002
 

Overview of topics...

This is the third of a three-part series on the new Rule 137 that took effect on January 1, 2002, mandating the arbitration of attorney's fee disputes at the client's option and applying the rule in all, not just matrimonial actions.

Treated in Part I in Issue 117

 

  • Background
  • Applicable Only Where Representation "Commenced" After January 1, 2002
  • Bar Associations to Administer Program
  • Where to Call for Guidance on Program Used Locally
  • Management of the Program
  • Governing Rules and Standards
  • Applicable in All Civil Cases, Not Just Marital Actions
  • Attorney's Duty to Inform Client of Arbitration Rights
  • When Is There "Dispute" That Triggers Rule 137 Procedures?
  • Attorney's Retaining Lien Exceptions in Which Rule 137 Doesn't Apply

Treated in Part II in Issue 118

 

  • The $1000 Threshold and the $50,000 Cap
  • Statute of Limitations Issues
  • Consent by Both Sides Is Universal Cure-All
  • The Arbitral Panels
  • Venue of the Arbitration
  • The Procedure to Be Followed
  • Lawyer's Non-Participation Invokes Grievance Procedure
  • May Default Be Excused?
  • Does CPLR Article 75 Apply to Fee Dispute Arbitrations?
  • The Model Forms, Prescribed for Most Steps
  • The Arbitration Hearing
  • The Award

Treated in Part III (in this Issue 119)

 

  • No "Review" of Award: Trial de Novo Allowed Instead
  • Procedure for Trial De Novo
  • Any Other "Review" If Loser Does Not Seek Trial de Novo?
  • Confidentiality
  • Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Issues
  • Enforcement of Award
  • Which Court to Enter the Award In?
  • Statutory Basis for Rule Allowing Direct Entry on Award
  • Appointment of Pro Bono Attorney to Help Client Enforce Award
  • Mediation Instead of Arbitration


 ARTICLE HEADLINES

FEATURE ARTICLE:
RULE 137 ON MANDATORY ARBITRATION OF ATTORNEY'S FEE DISPUTES TAKES EFFECT JANUARY 1, 2002, AND APPLIES IN ALL (NOT JUST MATRIMONIAL) ACTIONS

We conclude in this issue the three-part series on the new Rule 137 that took effect on January 1, 2002, mandating the arbitration of attorney's fee disputes at the client's option and applying the rule in all, not just matrimonial actions. The author acknowledges the helpful suggestions of Patrick M. Connors, his Albany Law School colleague and a specialist in professional ethics, who reviewed all three installments in this series.

 


PART III, CAPTIONS:

No "Review" of Award: Trial de Novo Allowed Instead

Procedure for Trial De Novo

Any Other "Review" If Loser Does Not Seek Trial de Novo?

Confidentiality

Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Issues

 
Enforcement of Award

Which Court to Enter the Award In?

Statutory Basis for Rule Allowing Direct Entry on Award

Appointment of Pro Bono Attorney to Help Client Enforce Award

Mediation Instead of Arbitration

         
  ©1993 David D. Siegel  All rights reserved.   |   Web design & hosting by Azurelink.   |  Site Comments?