Search the Issue Highlights:  

Search Tips

Issue Index About SPR Subscriptions The Author  
 

 

 
     

September Extra 1996
 
Overview of topics...

Lead Note:

THE NEW "OMNIBUS" WORKERS' COMPENSATION BILL, RESTRICTING THE TORT LIABILITY OF EMPLOYERS - CONTINUED

Other New Laws:

 

  • Clarifying Who "Clerk" Is for Filing Purposes

General Practice:

 

  • Dispute on Whether Appellant Mailing Notice of Entry Gets Extra 5 Days for Appeal
  • Transferring to Appellate Division a Case Wrongly Brought in Supreme Court

Open Citations:

 

  • Simels (Issue 39/Pages 3-4): 167 Misc.2d 894, 639 N.Y.S.2d 244.
  • Pokoik (44/1): 220 A.D.2d 13, 641 N.Y.S.2d 881.

 ARTICLE HEADLINES

FEATURE ARTICLE:
THE NEW "OMNIBUS" WORKERS' COMPENSATION BILL, RESTRICTING THE TORT LIABILITY OF EMPLOYERS - CONTINUED

• "Written Contract" Exception
• Some Observations About What "Grave Injury" Is
• Burden of Proof on "Grave Injury" Issue
• Immediate Trial of Issue? What of Estoppel?
 
• The Conforming Amendments of CPLR Article 14 and 16
• Differing Theories Still Allowed
• Effect on Other Laws
• Dole Case Restricted, Not Overruled
• More on Retroactivity


OTHER NEW LAWS

WHO'S THE CLERK?:
Amendments Attempt to Clarify Who "Clerk" Is for Filing Purposes

 
GENERAL PRACTICE

RUNNING OF APPEAL TIME:
Dispute on Whether Extra Five Days for Mail Applies When Appellant Itself Serves the Order

TRANSFER TO APPELLATE DIVISION:
Erroneous Commencement in Supreme Court Not Fatal; Transfer to Appellate Division Okay Without Limitations Consequences
         
  ©1993 David D. Siegel  All rights reserved.   |   Web design & hosting by Azurelink.   |  Site Comments?