Search the Issue Highlights:  

Search Tips

Issue Index About SPR Subscriptions The Author  
 

 

 
     

AUGUST 1993
 
Overview of topics...

Lead Note:

PLAINTIFF'S SURREPTITIOUS OBTAINING OF DEFENDANT-LAWYER 'S WORK PRODUCT BRINGS DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CASE


General Practice:
  • Consequence When Clerk Delays Things
  • One-Sided Trial De Novo Agreement Void
  • Converting Motion to Proceeding
  • Substituted Service Outside State
  • Frivolity Sanction Cancelled
Federal Practice:
  • Consolidating Arbitrations
... and more Open Citations:
  • Roche (Issue 3/Page 4): 155 Misc.2d 329.
  • Woodbury (Issue 4/Page 4): 155 Misc.2d 381.

 ARTICLE HEADLINES

FEATURE ARTICLE:

PLAINTIFF'S SURREPTITIOUS OBTAINING OF DEFENDANT-LAWYER 'S WORK PRODUCT BRINGS DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CASE


 THE NEW FILING SYSTEM

CAN INDEX NUMBER BE ISSUED IF NO SUMMONS OR OTHER LITIGATION-CONNECTED PAPER IS TENDERED FOR FILING?


 GENERAL PRACTICE POINTS

CLERK'S DELAY:

When D's Demand for Jury Trial Is Rejected Because Clerk Can't Find Note of Issue in File, Court Can Extend D's Demand Time

 
ARBITRATION CLAUSE UNCONSCIONABLE:
Court Voids Clause That Allows Insurer Trial de Novo When Award Exceeds $10,000 But Doesn't Give Same Right to Insured When Award Is for Less

"CONVERTING" ONE PROCEDURE TO ANOTHER:

Motion in Context of Action, Seeking Relief Associated with Special Proceeding, Can be "Converted" Under CPLR 103(c)


 BACKLOG ITEMS

JURISDICTION AND MERITS OVERLAP:
When "Permission" to Drive Bears on Owner's Liability and on Jurisdiction as Well, Jurisdictional Issue Should Await Trial

 
PLEADING DEFAMATION:
While Defamatory Words Must Be Pleaded Verbatim, Only the Equivalent Need Be Proved at Trial

SUBSTITUTED SERVICE:

If P Knows D Now Lives in Foreign Country, Substituted Service Methods Are Impeded

FRIVOLITY SANCTIONS:

If Delay in Submitting Judgment Is Found Excusable, It Can't Be Penalized as Frivolous


 FEDERAL PRACTICE

CONSOLIDATING ARBITRATIONS:
Second Circuit, Finding Recent U.S. Supreme Court Cases More Restrictive, Bars Consolidating Separate Arbitrations, a Contrast to New York Practice

         
  ©1993 David D. Siegel  All rights reserved.   |   Web design & hosting by Azurelink.   |  Site Comments?