Search the Issue Highlights:  

Search Tips

Issue Index About SPR Subscriptions The Author  
 

 

 
     

JUNE 1993
 
 ARTICLE HEADLINES    

FEATURE ARTICLE:

INTERPOSING UNRELATED COUNTERCLAIM FORFEITS OBJECTION TO PERSONAL JURISDICTION


 THE NEW FILING SYSTEM

THE SPECIAL PROCEEDING AND THE FILING SYSTEM: EVEN A REASSURANCE CAN BECOME A TRAP

REIMBURSEMENT FOR FEE:

System of Having Plaintiff Reimburse Defendant Who Pays Fee Doesn't Apply in Lower Courts

FILING IN MARITAL ACTIONS:

Post-Dating Notice of Appearance in Consent Divorce, in Contemplation of New Filing Requirement

 
 GENERAL PRACTICE POINTS

DOES MAILED CROSS-MOTION HAVE TO BE SERVED EIGHT DAYS BEFORE RETURN DAY, OR DO THREE SUFFICE?

SERVING SECRETARY OF STATE:

When Can Secretary of State Be Served in Behalf of Corporate Defendant in Lower Court?


 FEDERAL PRACTICE

RES JUDICATA:

"Judicial Estoppel" Bars Inconsistent Positions by Litigant Even If There's Been No "Judgment", as Res Judicata Requires

 

Overview of topics...

The New Filing System:
  • When to Re-Commence Dismissed Proceeding
  • Post-Dating Appearance in Divorce Actions
Adding Five Days for Mailed Cross-Motion Serving Secretary of State in Lower Courts "Judicial Estoppel" in Federal Actions ... and more
 
         
  ©1993 David D. Siegel  All rights reserved.   |   Web design & hosting by Azurelink.   |  Site Comments?